’n‹…˜fŻ‰ÈŠwêU ’n‹…‰ÈŠwçt‡•”“Á•Êu‰‰‰ï

“úŽž: 2009”N10ŒŽ5“ú(ŒŽ) 15:00 - 16:20
êŠ: ‹ž“s‘ċŠw—Šw•”1†ŠÙ5ŠK‘ċ‰ï‹cŽş(563†Žş)
‘è–Ú: The predictability of the atmosphere -- is two-dimensional turbulence a good model?
u‰‰ŽÒ: Dr. Joseph Tribbia (National Center for Atmospheric Research, USA)

u‰‰—vŽ|:
Historically, both two-dimensional and quasi-geostrophic turbulence have
served as paradigms for the behavior of the atmosphere on the large
scale. Both barotropic (2D) and baroclinic (quasi-3D) systems have been
used to understand the nature of the atmospheric energy spectrum and the
flow of information and uncertainty through scale interactions.  Through
the flow of uncertainty, estimates of atmospheric predictability have
been obtained using the inverse cascade of uncertainty inherent in the
dual inviscid constraints of conservation of energy and (potential)
enstrophy common to both 2D and Q-G flows. Despite their similarity with
respect to inviscid constraints, the details of the growth of
uncertainty and the loss of predictability due to small scale errors is
considerably different in 2D and Q-G turbulence and both differ from
more realistic models of the atmosphere in important ways.  My talk will
discuss and analyze the nature of these differences using structures
obtained through non-modal linear analysis techniques.

–₢‡‚í‚ıĉ: —]“cĴ’j